<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictable Initialization Vectors #security #cryptography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://specialbrands.net/2008/11/20/predictable-initialization-vectors-security-cryptography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://specialbrands.net/2008/11/20/predictable-initialization-vectors-security-cryptography/</link>
	<description>blaze your trail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webhat</title>
		<link>http://specialbrands.net/2008/11/20/predictable-initialization-vectors-security-cryptography/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webhat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webhat.wordpress.com/?p=699#comment-507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must add as a personal note that I still think Chris is wrong. A nonce of &lt;code&gt;0x00000001&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;0x00000002&lt;/code&gt; are unique and entirely useless, but I am willing to accept it if I made a mistake. As I said to Chris in a private mail: &lt;blockquote&gt;I still believe what I believe, which is that the nonce should still be unpredictable and, as you correctly stated, unique. Perhaps a hash of time in milliseconds would be an option, naturally one in which the likelihood of collisions is low.&lt;/blockquote&gt;We&#039;ve agreed to disagree about the entropy. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must add as a personal note that I still think Chris is wrong. A nonce of <code>0x00000001</code> and <code>0x00000002</code> are unique and entirely useless, but I am willing to accept it if I made a mistake. As I said to Chris in a private mail:<br />
<blockquote>I still believe what I believe, which is that the nonce should still be unpredictable and, as you correctly stated, unique. Perhaps a hash of time in milliseconds would be an option, naturally one in which the likelihood of collisions is low.</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;ve agreed to disagree about the entropy. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

